Suburbs

Bartlett’s proposed ordinance amendment to control the parking of recreational vehicles and similar things is a dicey situation. It seems easy to manage, but the specifics pose issues that need addressing.

The overall purpose is to protect property values. To make sure that the city doesn’t end up with junked cars parked in the front yard, along with RVs, ATVs, food trucks, boats, trailers, etc., etc. Then there are considerations for what is necessary if such things end up in the side yard or backyard of a house.

The Bartlett Board of Mayor and Aldermen has passed the amendment on the first of three required readings, as reporter Michael Waddell wrote this week. But the first reading started with some discussions of just how far to go with the language.

Among the considerations is whether to allow the vehicles in the front yard. And what kind of surface is required if they park in front of the house. The same holds for the side yard and backyard. Whether to require screening of the vehicles and what kind of barrier should limit the sight if they are in those two locations.

The aldermen did talk about some leniency when it comes to loading and unloading a vehicle, allowing them to stay on site for 24 hours in those situations.

Then there is always the issue of what homeowners should be allowed to do with their own property, versus the impact of that on the rest of the community. These are the questions that come up quite often, whether it’s a party house or an inflatable rainbow in a front yard for some holidays.

Then there are those who are already parking in spots that would be prevented if the amendment is passed. Are they grandfathered in? Must they adhere to any new requirements immediately?

“This proposed amendment reduces the economic value of my lot, but also deprives me of the enjoyment of my RV trailer unless I am willing to pay monthly storage fees,” resident Dwain Kicklighter told aldermen at the first reading.

The issue is a tough one to solve. And aldermen have a lot to consider regarding the best answer to a complex problem.

They have two more readings to figure out the best route for all involved.

But there are times when aldermen must make the best decision for the look of the city, especially when things have shifted little by little to where it is not in its best interest. - Suburbs editor Clay Bailey

We hope you enjoy reading the latest news from our suburban reporters. If you’re a Daily Memphian subscriber, we appreciate your support. If not, please sign up for unlimited access to all of our local news coverage.